PMID- 36284760 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20221028 IS - 2432-0935 (Electronic) IS - 2432-0935 (Linking) VI - 5 IP - 3 DP - 2020 Oct 30 TI - Computed Tomography Fluoroscopy-guided Core Needle Biopsy of Abdominal Para-aortic Lesions: A Retrospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Yield and Safety. PG - 128-133 LID - 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0009 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic yield and safety of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of abdominal para-aortic lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy was performed for 30 lesions (median long diameter 2.4 cm; range, 1.3-12.4 cm) in 30 patients (11 women and 19 men; median age 64.5 years; age range 37-90 years) using 18- and/or 20-gauge needles. The median length of the biopsy needle tracts was 9.3 cm (range, 5.5-13.0 cm). The median number of biopsy fires was 3 (range, 2-6). The median duration of the procedures was 33 min (range, 14-80 min). The diagnostic yield and adverse events (AEs) were retrospectively evaluated. The AEs were categorized using the Society of Interventional Radiology classification system. Technical success was determined by the acquisition of a sufficient number of specimens for pathological diagnosis. Diagnostic yield was defined as the match between the pathological and final diagnoses. RESULTS: In all 30 procedures, CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsies of the abdominal para-aortic lesions were technically successful. Twenty-six lesions were malignant (9 malignant lymphomas and 17 lymph node [LN] metastases) and four were benign (one schwannoma, one granular cell tumor, and two normal LNs). One case was insufficiently diagnosed as a B-cell lymphoma; thus, the diagnostic yield of the biopsy was 96.7%. AEs occurred in seven procedures (23.3%), including six cases of class A hemorrhage and one case of class B vasovagal reaction. CONCLUSIONS: CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of abdominal para-aortic lesions is a safe procedure and provides a high diagnostic yield. CI - (c) 2020 Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology. FAU - Tomita, Koji AU - Tomita K AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. FAU - Iguchi, Toshihiro AU - Iguchi T AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. FAU - Hiraki, Takao AU - Hiraki T AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. FAU - Matsui, Yusuke AU - Matsui Y AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. FAU - Uka, Mayu AU - Uka M AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. FAU - Komaki, Toshiyuki AU - Komaki T AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. FAU - Gobara, Hideo AU - Gobara H AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. FAU - Kanazawa, Susumu AU - Kanazawa S AD - Department of Radiology, Okayama University Medical School, Japan. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20200903 PL - Japan TA - Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama) JT - Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) JID - 101745449 PMC - PMC9550396 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Lymph node OT - aorta OT - biopsy OT - computed tomography OT - fluoroscopy COIS- The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2020/09/03 00:00 MHDA- 2020/09/03 00:01 PMCR- 2020/09/03 CRDT- 2022/10/26 02:08 PHST- 2020/03/18 00:00 [received] PHST- 2020/06/20 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2022/10/26 02:08 [entrez] PHST- 2020/09/03 00:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2020/09/03 00:01 [medline] PHST- 2020/09/03 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0009 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama). 2020 Sep 3;5(3):128-133. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2020-0009. eCollection 2020 Oct 30.