PMID- 36687549 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20231031 IS - 0973-6247 (Print) IS - 1998-3565 (Electronic) IS - 0973-6247 (Linking) VI - 16 IP - 2 DP - 2022 Jul-Dec TI - Prozone phenomenon in pretransplant testing: An interesting conundrum involving solid-phase and cell-based assays. PG - 180-185 LID - 10.4103/ajts.ajts_145_20 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major determinant in deciding upon solid organ histocompatibility. Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (Donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs)) are always a contraindication for solid organ transplantation, and identification of DSA becomes very crucial before transplantation to provide long-term graft survival. For identification of DSA, usually, either cell-based or HLA bead-based assay is being used in laboratories. However, both cell-based and bead-based assays have certain limitations. One such common limitation is "prozone effect," which can give false-negative results. Here, we would like to present a small pilot study to analyze the effect of the prozone phenomenon in the cell-based and HLA bead-based assays and its utility in histocompatibility testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a series of four experiments, cell-based assay, flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM), and HLA bead-based flow cytometric panel reactive antibodies (PRAs) were performed. Single-antigen bead (SAB) testing was conducted as a first experiment on four known positives samples for anti-HLA antibody-antibodies. In the second experiment, these four samples were pooled together (called pooled sera in the text) and tested for FCXM and PRA. In the third experiment, known commercially available positive control sera were mixed with pooled positive sera (positive control sera + pooled sera) to prepare, what we have called "positive concoction" in the text. In the fourth experiment, the positive concoction was diluted serially (1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:16) and FCXM and PRA were performed again to analyze and compare the prozone effect. RESULTS: Pooled sera did not have the expected median fluorescence intensity (MFI) values in FCXM assay, whereas the PRA was showing >90% positivity. In positive concoction, the MFI of FCXM assay was observed to be declining; however, PRA values remained almost constant. Dilutions of the pooled sera showed that MFI values of FCXM assays were increased suddenly after dilution. The highest MFI values were observed in 1:4 dilution of the sera, and then, it declined gradually, but the PRA values remained almost constant even after serial dilutions. CONCLUSION: In our experimental findings, it was clear that cell-based assay (FCXM) was more severely affected by the prozone, whereas solid-phase (flow PRA) assay remained resistant to prozone. CI - Copyright: (c) 2022 Asian Journal of Transfusion Science. FAU - Singh, Parvind AU - Singh P AD - Department of Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India. FAU - Tiwari, Aseem Kumar AU - Tiwari AK AD - Department of Transfusion Medicine, Medanta - The Medicity, Gurugram, Haryana, India. FAU - Mishra, Vikash Chandra AU - Mishra VC AD - Department of Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India. FAU - Deshpande, Trupti Vimlakar AU - Deshpande TV AD - Department of Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India. FAU - Dorwal, Pranav AU - Dorwal P AD - Department of Flowcytometry, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand. FAU - Bhardwaj, Amit Kr AU - Bhardwaj AK AD - Department of Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India. FAU - Kumari, Sneha AU - Kumari S AD - Department of Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India. FAU - Raina, Vimarsh AU - Raina V AD - Department of Transplant Immunology, Chimera Transplant Research Foundation, New Delhi, India. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20220727 PL - India TA - Asian J Transfus Sci JT - Asian journal of transfusion science JID - 101306858 PMC - PMC9855212 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies OT - flow cytometric cross-match OT - flow cytometry OT - panel reactive antibodies OT - prozone effect (hook effect) OT - single-antigen bead assay OT - solid-phase immunoassay COIS- There are no conflicts of interest. EDAT- 2023/01/24 06:00 MHDA- 2023/01/24 06:01 PMCR- 2022/07/01 CRDT- 2023/01/23 05:05 PHST- 2020/09/22 00:00 [received] PHST- 2021/05/16 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2021/06/22 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/01/23 05:05 [entrez] PHST- 2023/01/24 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/01/24 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2022/07/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - AJTS-16-180 [pii] AID - 10.4103/ajts.ajts_145_20 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Asian J Transfus Sci. 2022 Jul-Dec;16(2):180-185. doi: 10.4103/ajts.ajts_145_20. Epub 2022 Jul 27.