PMID- 36893100 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20230313 LR - 20230420 IS - 1932-6203 (Electronic) IS - 1932-6203 (Linking) VI - 18 IP - 3 DP - 2023 TI - Additive manufacturing process selection for automotive industry using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC EDAS. PG - e0282676 LID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0282676 [doi] LID - e0282676 AB - For many different types of businesses, additive manufacturing has great potential for new product and process development in many different types of businesses including automotive industry. On the other hand, there are a variety of additive manufacturing alternatives available today, each with its own unique characteristics, and selecting the most suitable one has become a necessity for relevant bodies. The evaluation of additive manufacturing alternatives can be viewed as an uncertain multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem due to the potential number of criteria and candidates as well as the inherent subjectivity of various decision-experts engaging in the process. Pythagorean fuzzy sets are an extension of intuitionistic fuzzy sets that are effective in handling ambiguity and uncertainty in decision-making. This study offers an integrated fuzzy MCDM approach based on Pythagorean fuzzy sets for assessing additive manufacturing alternatives for the automotive industry. Objective significance levels of criteria are determined using the Criteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) technique, and additive manufacturing alternatives are prioritized using the Evaluation based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) method. A sensitivity analysis is performed to examine the variations against varying criterion and decision-maker weights. Moreover, a comparative analysis is conducted to validate the acquired findings. CI - Copyright: (c) 2023 Menekse et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. FAU - Menekse, Akin AU - Menekse A AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-7519-3749 AD - Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. FAU - Ertemel, Adnan Veysel AU - Ertemel AV AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-5028-1096 AD - Faculty of Management, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. FAU - Camgoz Akdag, Hatice AU - Camgoz Akdag H AD - Faculty of Management, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. FAU - Gorener, Ali AU - Gorener A AUID- ORCID: 0000-0001-6000-5143 AD - Faculty of Management, Istanbul Commerce University, Istanbul, Turkey. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20230309 PL - United States TA - PLoS One JT - PloS one JID - 101285081 SB - IM MH - *Decision Making MH - *Fuzzy Logic MH - Industry MH - Uncertainty MH - Commerce PMC - PMC9997986 COIS- The authors have declared that no competing interests exist EDAT- 2023/03/10 06:00 MHDA- 2023/03/14 06:00 PMCR- 2023/03/09 CRDT- 2023/03/09 13:33 PHST- 2023/01/05 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/02/19 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/03/09 13:33 [entrez] PHST- 2023/03/10 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/03/14 06:00 [medline] PHST- 2023/03/09 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - PONE-D-23-00349 [pii] AID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0282676 [doi] PST - epublish SO - PLoS One. 2023 Mar 9;18(3):e0282676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282676. eCollection 2023.