PMID- 37112382 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20230430 LR - 20230501 IS - 1424-8220 (Electronic) IS - 1424-8220 (Linking) VI - 23 IP - 8 DP - 2023 Apr 17 TI - Multicriteria Decision Making in Supply Chain Management Using FMEA and Hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE Algorithms. LID - 10.3390/s23084041 [doi] LID - 4041 AB - In today's global environment, supplier selection is one of the critical strategic decisions made by supply chain management. The supplier selection process involves the evaluation of suppliers based on several criteria, including their core capabilities, price offerings, lead times, geographical proximity, data collection sensor networks, and associated risks. The ubiquitous presence of internet of things (IoT) sensors at different levels of supply chains can result in risks that cascade to the upstream end of the supply chain, making it imperative to implement a systematic supplier selection methodology. This research proposes a combinatorial approach for risk assessment in supplier selection using the failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) with hybrid analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE). The FMEA is used to identify the failure modes based on a set of supplier criteria. The AHP is implemented to determine the global weights for each criterion, and PROMETHEE is used to prioritize the optimal supplier based on the lowest supply chain risk. The integration of multicriteria decision making (MCDM) methods overcomes the shortcomings of the traditional FMEA and enhances the precision of prioritizing the risk priority numbers (RPN). A case study is presented to validate the combinatorial model. The outcomes indicate that suppliers were evaluated more effectively based on company chosen criteria to select a low-risk supplier over the traditional FMEA approach. This research establishes a foundation for the application of multicriteria decision-making methodology for unbiased prioritization of critical supplier selection criteria and evaluation of different supply chain suppliers. FAU - Altubaishe, Bandar AU - Altubaishe B AD - Department of Supply Chain Management, University of Business and Technology, University of Business and Technology St, Jeddah 23847, Saudi Arabia. FAU - Desai, Salil AU - Desai S AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-6116-2105 AD - Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA. AD - Center of Excellence in Product Design and Advanced Manufacturing, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC 27411, USA. LA - eng GR - CMMI/National Science Foundation/ GR - Center of Excellence in Product Design and Advanced Manufacturing (CEPDAM)/North Carolina A&T State University/ PT - Journal Article DEP - 20230417 PL - Switzerland TA - Sensors (Basel) JT - Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) JID - 101204366 SB - IM PMC - PMC10146861 OTO - NOTNLM OT - analytical hierarchy process (AHP) OT - failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) OT - internet of things (IoT) sensors OT - preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) OT - supply chain risk management COIS- The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. EDAT- 2023/04/28 06:42 MHDA- 2023/04/28 06:43 PMCR- 2023/04/17 CRDT- 2023/04/28 01:51 PHST- 2023/03/08 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/04/08 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2023/04/11 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/04/28 06:43 [medline] PHST- 2023/04/28 06:42 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/04/28 01:51 [entrez] PHST- 2023/04/17 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - s23084041 [pii] AID - sensors-23-04041 [pii] AID - 10.3390/s23084041 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Sensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 17;23(8):4041. doi: 10.3390/s23084041.