PMID- 37128307 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20230503 IS - 2405-8440 (Print) IS - 2405-8440 (Electronic) IS - 2405-8440 (Linking) VI - 9 IP - 4 DP - 2023 Apr TI - Sustainable selection of waste collection trucks considering feasible future scenarios by applying the stratified best and worst method. PG - e15481 LID - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15481 [doi] LID - e15481 AB - Municipal solid waste (MSW) management is vital in achieving sustainable development goals. It is a complex activity embracing collection, transport, recycling, and disposal; and whose management depends on proper strategic decision-making. The use of decision support methods such as multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) is widespread in MSW management. However, their application mainly focuses on selecting plant locations and the best technologies for waste treatment. Despite the critical role played by transport in promoting sustainability, MCDM has seldom been applied for the selection of sustainable transport alternatives in the field of MSW management. There are a few MCDM studies about choosing waste collection vehicles, but none that include the most recent green vehicles among the options or consider feasible future scenarios. In this article, different engine technologies for collection trucks (diesel, compressed natural gas (CNG), hybrid CNG-electric, electric, and hydrogen) are evaluated under sustainability criteria in a Spanish city by applying the stratified best and worst method (SBWM). This method enables considering the uncertainty associated with future events to establish various feasible scenarios. The results show that the best-valued options are electric and diesel trucks, in that order, followed by CNG and hybrid CNG-electric, and with hydrogen-powered trucks coming last. The SBWM has proven helpful in defining a comprehensive framework for selecting the most suitable engine technology to support long-term MSW collection. Considering sustainability among the criteria and feasible future scenarios in waste management collection decision-making provides more comprehensive and conclusive results that help managers and policymakers make better informed and more reliable decisions. CI - (c) 2023 The Authors. FAU - Moreno-Solaz, Hector AU - Moreno-Solaz H AD - Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability Research Center (PRINS), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain. FAU - Artacho-Ramirez, Miguel-Angel AU - Artacho-Ramirez MA AD - Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability Research Center (PRINS), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain. FAU - Aragones-Beltran, Pablo AU - Aragones-Beltran P AD - Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability Research Center (PRINS), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain. FAU - Cloquell-Ballester, Victor-Andres AU - Cloquell-Ballester VA AD - Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability Research Center (PRINS), Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, Spain. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20230414 PL - England TA - Heliyon JT - Heliyon JID - 101672560 PMC - PMC10148105 OTO - NOTNLM OT - MCDM OT - Municipal solid waste OT - Stratification OT - Stratified best and worst method OT - Sustainable mobility OT - Waste collection trucks EDAT- 2023/05/02 06:42 MHDA- 2023/05/02 06:43 PMCR- 2023/04/14 CRDT- 2023/05/02 01:56 PHST- 2022/12/29 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/03/08 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2023/04/11 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/05/02 06:43 [medline] PHST- 2023/05/02 06:42 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/05/02 01:56 [entrez] PHST- 2023/04/14 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S2405-8440(23)02688-9 [pii] AID - e15481 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15481 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Heliyon. 2023 Apr 14;9(4):e15481. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15481. eCollection 2023 Apr.