PMID- 37148636 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20230605 LR - 20230605 IS - 1872-7565 (Electronic) IS - 0169-2607 (Linking) VI - 237 DP - 2023 Jul TI - A combined FE-hybrid MCDM framework for improving the performance of the conical stem tibial design for TAR with the addition of pegs. PG - 107574 LID - S0169-2607(23)00239-0 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107574 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The conical stemmed design of the tibial component for total ankle replacement (TAR) (example Mobility design) uses a single intramedullary stem for primary fixation. Tibial component loosening is a common mode of failure for TAR. Primary causes of loosening are lack of bone ingrowth due to excessive micromotion at the implant-bone interface and bone resorption due to stress shielding after implantation. The fixation feature of the conical stemmed design can be modified with the addition of small pegs to avoid loosening. The aim of the study is to select the improved design for conical stemmed TAR using a combined Finite Element (FE) hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) framework. METHODS: The geometry and material properties of the bone for FE modeling were extracted from the CT data. Thirty-two design alternatives with varying pegs in number (one, two, four, eight), location (anterior, posterior, medial, lateral, anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, equally spaced), and height (5 mm, 4 mm, 3 mm, 2 mm) were prepared. All models were analyzed for dorsiflexion, neutral, and plantarflexion loading. The proximal part of the tibia was fixed. The implant-bone interface coefficient of friction was taken as 0.5. The implant-bone micromotion, stress shielding, volume of bone resection, and surgical simplicity were the important criteria considered for evaluating the performance of TAR. The designs were compared using a hybrid MCDM method of WASPAS, TOPSIS, EDAS, and VIKOR. The weight calculations were based on fuzzy AHP and the final ranks on the Degree of Membership method. RESULTS: The addition of pegs decreased the mean implant-bone micromotions and increased stress shielding. There was a marginal decrease in micromotion and a marginal increase in stress shielding when the peg heights were increased. The results of hybrid MCDM indicated that the most preferable alternative designs were two pegs of 4 mm height in the AP direction to the main stem, two pegs of 4 mm height in the ML direction, and one peg of 3 mm height in the A direction. CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes of this study suggest that the addition of pegs can reduce the implant-bone micromotions. Modified three designs would be useful by considering implant-bone micromotions, stress shielding, volume of bone resection, and surgical simplicity. CI - Copyright (c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. FAU - Jyoti AU - Jyoti AD - Biomechanics Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Kamand, Mandi, 175075, Himachal Pradesh, India. FAU - Ghosh, Rajesh AU - Ghosh R AD - Biomechanics Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical & Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Mandi, Kamand, Mandi, 175075, Himachal Pradesh, India. Electronic address: rajesh@iitmandi.ac.in. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20230427 PL - Ireland TA - Comput Methods Programs Biomed JT - Computer methods and programs in biomedicine JID - 8506513 SB - IM MH - Tibia/surgery MH - *Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle MH - Prosthesis Design MH - *Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods MH - Finite Element Analysis MH - Stress, Mechanical OTO - NOTNLM OT - Conical stemmed design OT - Finite element analysis OT - Hybrid multi-criteria decision making OT - Micromotion OT - Stress shielding OT - Tibial component OT - Total ankle replacement COIS- Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. EDAT- 2023/05/07 00:42 MHDA- 2023/06/05 06:42 CRDT- 2023/05/06 18:03 PHST- 2022/10/19 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/04/10 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2023/04/26 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/06/05 06:42 [medline] PHST- 2023/05/07 00:42 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/05/06 18:03 [entrez] AID - S0169-2607(23)00239-0 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107574 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Jul;237:107574. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107574. Epub 2023 Apr 27.