PMID- 37172522 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20230526 LR - 20230526 IS - 1618-0631 (Electronic) IS - 0344-0338 (Linking) VI - 246 DP - 2023 Jun TI - lncRNA NORAD, soluble ICAM1 and their correlations may be related to the regulation of the tumor immune microenvironment in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). PG - 154494 LID - S0344-0338(23)00194-2 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154494 [doi] AB - NORAD, non-coding RNA activated by DNA damage, is a Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) transcript that modulates genome stability and has been reported to be dysregulated in different cancers. Although it has been reported to be upregulated in tumor cells mostly for solid organ cancers, it has also been reported to be downregulated in some cancers. Although the pathophysiological mechanism is not fully understood, a negative correlation between NORAD and intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) has been shown in experimental models, but this situation has not been evaluated in terms of cancer. We aimed to evaluate the potential roles of these two biomarker candidates together and separately in the clinicopathological axis in Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) in a case-control study setting. The interactions of NORAD and ICAM1 at the RNA level were evaluated interactively by the RIblast program. sICAM1 (soluble intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1) levels were determined by ELISA in one hundred and five individuals (forty-four LSCC, sixty-one control) and lncRNA NORAD expression in eighty-eight tissues (forty-four LSCC tumors, forty-four tumor-free surrounding tissues) was determined by Real-time PCR. While the energy treesholud was - 16 kcal/mol between NORAD and ICAM1, the total energy was 176.33 kcal/mol, and 9 base pair pairings from 4 critical points were detected. NORAD expression level was found to be higher in tumor surrounding tissue compared to tumor tissue, and sICAM1 was higher in the control group compared to LSCC (p = 0.004; p = 0.02). NORAD discreminte tumor surrounding tissue from tumor (AUC: 0.674; optimal sensitivity:87.50%; optimal specificity 54.55%; cut-off point as >1.58 fold change; P = 0.034). The sICAM1 level was found to be higher in the control (494,814 +/- 93.64 ng/L) than LSCC (432.95 +/- 93.64 ng/L) (p = 0.02). sICAM1 discreminte control group from LSCC (AUC: 0.624; optimal sensitivity 68,85%; optimal specificity 61,36%; cut-off point