PMID- 37346799 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20230701 IS - 0038-0121 (Print) IS - 0038-0121 (Electronic) IS - 0038-0121 (Linking) VI - 88 DP - 2023 Aug TI - Evaluation of the treatment options for COVID-19 patients using generalized hesitant fuzzy- multi criteria decision making techniques. PG - 101614 LID - 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101614 [doi] AB - The breakout of the pandemic COVID-19 has affected numerous countries and territories worldwide. As COVID-19 specific medicines yet to be invented, at present the treatment is case specific, hence identification and evaluation of different prevalent treatment options based on various criteria and attributes are very important not only from the point of view of present pandemic but also for futuristic pandemic preparedness. The present study focuses on identifying, evaluation and ranking of treatment options using Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). In this regard, the existing literature, doctors and scientist were interviewed to know the current treatment options in vogue and the scale of their importance with respect to the criteria. The criteria taken are side effect, regime cost, treatment duration, plasma stability, plasma turnover, time of suppression, ease of application, drug-drug interaction, compliance, fever, pneumonia, intensive care, organ failure, macrophage activation syndrome, hemophagocytic syndrome, pregnancy, kidney problem, age. This study extended Hesitant Fuzzy Set (HFS) to Generalized Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (GHFS). Generalized Hesitant Pentagonal Fuzzy Number (GHPFN) is developed. The properties of GHPFN are demonstrated. Two types of GHPFN has been described. The GHPFN (2nd type) along with MCDM tool Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) has been applied to rank the treatment options. The result of the study ranked 'Hydroxychloroquine' as the first alternative followed by, 'Plasma Exchange', 'Tocilizumab', 'Remdesivir' and 'Favipravir'. To check the robustness and steadiness of the proposed methodology, comparative analysis and sensitivity analysis has been conducted. CI - (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. FAU - Nandi, Sandip AU - Nandi S AD - Institute of Business Management & Research, Kolkata, WB, India. FAU - Granata, Giuseppe AU - Granata G AD - Department of Economics University Mercatorum of Rome, Italy. FAU - Jana, Subrata AU - Jana S AD - Department of Mathematics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. FAU - Ghorui, Neha AU - Ghorui N AD - Department of Mathematics, Prasanta Chandra MahalanobisMahavidyalaya, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. FAU - Mondal, Sankar Prasad AU - Mondal SP AD - Department of Applied Science, MaulanaAbulKalam Azad University of Technology, Haringhata, West Bengal, India. FAU - Bhaumik, Moumita AU - Bhaumik M AD - ICMR-National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, Beleghata, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20230605 PL - United States TA - Socioecon Plann Sci JT - Socio-economic planning sciences JID - 9877811 PMC - PMC10241491 OTO - NOTNLM OT - COVID-19 OT - GHFS OT - GHPFN OT - GHPFN (2nd type) OT - HFS OT - MCDM OT - TOPSIS EDAT- 2023/06/22 13:09 MHDA- 2023/06/22 13:10 PMCR- 2023/06/05 CRDT- 2023/06/22 09:55 PHST- 2022/09/27 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/03/16 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2023/05/13 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/06/22 13:10 [medline] PHST- 2023/06/22 13:09 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/06/22 09:55 [entrez] PHST- 2023/06/05 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - S0038-0121(23)00114-3 [pii] AID - 101614 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101614 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Socioecon Plann Sci. 2023 Aug;88:101614. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101614. Epub 2023 Jun 5.