PMID- 37406350 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20231216 LR - 20231216 IS - 1538-7151 (Electronic) IS - 0277-1691 (Linking) VI - 43 IP - 1 DP - 2024 Jan 1 TI - HER2 Status Assessment in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma: Comparative Analysis of Two Proposed Testing and Interpretation Algorithms. PG - 4-14 LID - 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000943 [doi] AB - HER2 status is now routinely assessed in endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) due to the reported predictive value of HER2 protein overexpression and/or gene amplification. Herein the authors compare 2 proposed testing and interpretation guidelines for HER2 in ESC. Forty-three consecutive cases of ESC that had been dually tested by both HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were interpreted using 2 sets of guidelines. Guideline set 1 (GS1) is the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines for breast cancer. Guideline set 2 (GS2) is a recent proposal that is a slight modification of the enrollment criteria for the clinical trial (NCT01367002) that demonstrated a survival benefit for anti-HER2 therapy in ESC. By IHC, GS1 and GS2, respectively classified 39.5% (17/43) and 28% (12/43) of ESC as HER2-negative, 37.2% (16/43) and 53.4% (23/43) as HER2 equivocal, and 23.2% (10/43) and 18.6% (8/43) as HER2-positive ( P > 0.05 for all). IHC and FISH were highly concordant at the extremes using either set of guidelines, as no cases were found to be IHC3+/FISH-negative or IHC 0-1+/FISH-positive. GS1 and GS2 were comparable regarding the proportion of IHC equivocal cases that were HER2 amplified by FISH (19% vs 23% respectively; [ P = 0.71]). GS1 and GS2 displayed 98% (42/43) concordance regarding the final (IHC and/or FISH-based) classification of tumors as being HER2-positive or negative, and the same 13 cases were ultimately classified as HER2 amplified using either GS1 or GS2. One "discordant" case was classified as HER2-positive using GS2 but HER2-negative using GS1 (HER2 IHC score 2+ using both guidelines, HER2:CEP17 signal ratio of 3, HER2 signal number of 3.4). Six (14%) of the 43 cases (FISH Groups: 2, 3, and 4) would require IHC results to interpret the FISH findings using GS1. Because GS1 requires that the HER2 IHC staining be observed within a homogeneous and contiguous invasive cell population, and this is not a requirement in GS2, GS2 may be better suited for ESC given its frequently heterogeneous staining pattern. Additional studies may be required on the optimal interpretation of problematic dual-probe FISH scenarios in GS2 and the necessity for IHC correlation in such scenarios. Using either set of guidelines, our findings support a reflex testing strategy of restricting FISH testing to cases that are IHC equivocal. CI - Copyright (c) 2023 by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. FAU - Hashem, Sherin AU - Hashem S FAU - Zare, Somaye Y AU - Zare SY FAU - Fadare, Oluwole AU - Fadare O LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20230609 PL - United States TA - Int J Gynecol Pathol JT - International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists JID - 8214845 RN - EC 2.7.10.1 (Receptor, ErbB-2) RN - 0 (Biomarkers, Tumor) SB - IM MH - Female MH - Humans MH - Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism MH - In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods MH - *Breast Neoplasms/pathology MH - Gene Amplification MH - *Endometrial Neoplasms/diagnosis/genetics MH - *Carcinoma/genetics MH - Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism COIS- The authors declare no conflict of interest. EDAT- 2023/07/05 19:12 MHDA- 2023/12/17 09:43 CRDT- 2023/07/05 17:02 PHST- 2023/12/17 09:43 [medline] PHST- 2023/07/05 19:12 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/07/05 17:02 [entrez] AID - 00004347-990000000-00087 [pii] AID - 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000943 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2024 Jan 1;43(1):4-14. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000943. Epub 2023 Jun 9.