PMID- 37490485 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20231024 LR - 20231024 IS - 1932-6203 (Electronic) IS - 1932-6203 (Linking) VI - 18 IP - 7 DP - 2023 TI - Universal screening or a universal risk assessment combined with risk-based screening for multidrug-resistant microorganisms upon admission: Comparing strategies. PG - e0289163 LID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0289163 [doi] LID - e0289163 AB - OBJECTIVE: Timely identification of patients who carry multidrug-resistant microorganisms (MDRO) is needed to prevent nosocomial spread to other patients and to the hospital environment. We aimed to compare the yield of a universal screening strategy upon admission to the currently installed universal risk assessment combined with risk-based screening upon admission. METHODS: This observational study was conducted within a prospective cohort study. From January 1, 2018, until September 1, 2019, patients admitted to our hospital were asked to participate. Nasal and perianal samples were taken upon admission and checked for the presence of MDRO. The results of the universal risk assessment and risk-based screening were collected retrospectively from electronic health records. RESULTS: In total, 1017 patients with 1069 separate hospital admissions participated in the study. Universal screening identified 38 (3.6%) unknown MDRO carriers upon admission (37 individual patients), all carrying extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. For 946 of 1069 (88.5%) patients, both the universal risk assessment and universal screening were performed. For 19 (2.0%) admissions, >/=1 risk factor was identified. The universal risk assessment identified one (0.1%) unknown carrier, compared to 37 out of 946 carriers for the universal screening (P<0.001). Of the 37 carriers identified through the universal screening, 35 (94.6%) reported no risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in our low endemic setting, a universal screening strategy identified significantly more MDRO carriers than the currently implemented universal risk-assessment. When implementing a universal risk-assessment, risk factors should be carefully selected to be able to identify ESBL-E carriers. While the universal screening identified more MDRO carriers, further research is needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of this strategy. CI - Copyright: (c) 2023 van der Schoor et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. FAU - van der Schoor, Adrienne S AU - van der Schoor AS AD - Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Severin, Juliette A AU - Severin JA AD - Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Klaassen, Corne H W AU - Klaassen CHW AD - Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - van den Akker, Johannes P C AU - van den Akker JPC AD - Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Bruno, Marco J AU - Bruno MJ AD - Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Hendriks, Johanna M AU - Hendriks JM AD - Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Vos, Margreet C AU - Vos MC AD - Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. FAU - Voor In 't Holt, Anne F AU - Voor In 't Holt AF AUID- ORCID: 0000-0002-3560-1725 AD - Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PT - Observational Study PT - Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't DEP - 20230725 PL - United States TA - PLoS One JT - PloS one JID - 101285081 SB - IM MH - Risk Assessment MH - *Drug Resistance, Multiple MH - Patient Admission MH - Prospective Studies MH - Humans MH - Male MH - Female MH - Adolescent MH - Young Adult MH - Adult MH - Middle Aged MH - Aged MH - Aged, 80 and over PMC - PMC10368271 COIS- The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. EDAT- 2023/07/25 19:15 MHDA- 2023/07/27 06:43 PMCR- 2023/07/25 CRDT- 2023/07/25 13:43 PHST- 2023/03/14 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/07/12 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/07/27 06:43 [medline] PHST- 2023/07/25 19:15 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/07/25 13:43 [entrez] PHST- 2023/07/25 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - PONE-D-23-07434 [pii] AID - 10.1371/journal.pone.0289163 [doi] PST - epublish SO - PLoS One. 2023 Jul 25;18(7):e0289163. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289163. eCollection 2023.