PMID- 37716630 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20240202 LR - 20240226 IS - 1526-3231 (Electronic) IS - 0749-8063 (Linking) VI - 40 IP - 2 DP - 2024 Feb TI - No Difference In Clinical Outcomes Following Repair of Large Retracted Anterior Rotator Cuff Tears Using Patch Augmentation With Human Dermal Allograft Versus Anterior Cable Reconstruction With Biceps Tendon Autograft. PG - 294-302 LID - S0749-8063(23)00763-6 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.077 [doi] AB - PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes and tendon integrity after rotator cuff repair combined with anterior cable reconstruction (ACR) using the proximal biceps tendon and patch augmentation (PA) using a human dermal allograft (HDA) in a large retracted anterior rotator cuff tear. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with 2 different augmentation procedures between January 2017 and December 2020 were enrolled. The inclusion criteria were patients who were treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with ACR using the proximal biceps tendon (ACR group) or patch augmentation using a an HDA (PA group) and follow-up for at least 2 years. Clinical outcomes were assessed using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, and the number of patients who achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCID). Magnetic resonance imaging was performed to evaluate tendon integrity after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were enrolled (ACR group = 55 patients and PA group = 37 patients). The mean ASES and Constant scores significantly improved in the ACR group (68.8 +/- 15.3 and 58.4 +/- 16.9 before surgery vs 91.4 +/- 6.3 and 87.8 +/- 6.0 after surgery, P < .001) and in the PA group (63.7 +/- 16.7 and 57.9 +/- 15.4 before surgery vs 93.1 +/- 6.3 and 88.3 +/- 6.2 after surgery, P < .001). Overall, 78 patients (84.8%) achieved the MCID with 81.8% in the ACR group and 89.2% in the PA group, with no significant differences between the 2 groups (P = .638). Ten patients (18.2%) had retear in the ACR group, and three patients (8.1%) had retear in the PA group (P = .174). CONCLUSIONS: In large retracted anterior rotator cuff tears, both augmentation techniques using biceps tendon autograft and HDA provided satisfactory clinical outcomes that achieved the MCID in 84.8%, range of motion restoration, and lower retear rates with no significant differences between the two groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective case-control study. CI - Copyright (c) 2023 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Kim, Seong Hun AU - Kim SH AD - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea. FAU - Shin, Sang-Jin AU - Shin SJ AD - Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: sjshin622@ewha.ac.kr. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20230915 PL - United States TA - Arthroscopy JT - Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association JID - 8506498 SB - IM CIN - Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):303-304. PMID: 38296436 MH - Humans MH - *Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery/pathology MH - Rotator Cuff/surgery/pathology MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Elbow MH - Case-Control Studies MH - Autografts MH - Tendons/surgery/pathology MH - Magnetic Resonance Imaging MH - Allografts/pathology MH - Treatment Outcome MH - Arthroscopy/methods MH - Range of Motion, Articular EDAT- 2023/09/17 00:41 MHDA- 2024/02/02 06:42 CRDT- 2023/09/16 19:17 PHST- 2023/04/02 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/08/17 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2023/08/20 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2024/02/02 06:42 [medline] PHST- 2023/09/17 00:41 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/09/16 19:17 [entrez] AID - S0749-8063(23)00763-6 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.077 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Arthroscopy. 2024 Feb;40(2):294-302. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.08.077. Epub 2023 Sep 15.