PMID- 38046478 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20231205 IS - 2168-8184 (Print) IS - 2168-8184 (Electronic) IS - 2168-8184 (Linking) VI - 15 IP - 10 DP - 2023 Oct TI - Comparison Between Pantoprazole Intermittent Dosing and Continuous Infusion in Suspected Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Prior to Endoscopy: Impact of a Pharmacist-Driven Protocol to Reduce Utilization of Pantoprazole Continuous Infusion. PG - e48056 LID - 10.7759/cureus.48056 [doi] LID - e48056 AB - BACKGROUND: Current practice for patients with suspected or confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is to utilize a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) bolus followed by a continuous infusion for 72 hours. Literature has shown similar outcomes with intermittent bolus dosing compared to continuous infusion. Substitution would lead to reduced costs and utilization of resources. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study conducted via chart review. Utilizing electronic healthcare record reports, patients in the control arm were screened for inclusion if they received a pantoprazole continuous infusion from December 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021. A total of 38 patients were included in the control arm. Patients in the experimental arm were screened for inclusion with pantoprazole intermittent therapy from January 1, 2022, to June 30, 2022. A total of 60 patients were included in the experimental arm. The primary outcome was a 30-day GIB recurrence. Secondary outcomes included 30-day hospital readmission, 30-day Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile), hospital length of stay (LOS), and number of pantoprazole vials utilized. RESULTS: There was a 65% reduction in the 30-day GIB recurrence in the intermittent bolus arm compared to the continuous infusion arm. Thirty-day hospital readmission was 57% lower in the intermittent bolus arm compared to the continuous infusion arm. The LOS between the two arms was almost identical with the median being five days for the intermittent bolus arm and the median being four days for the continuous infusion arm. The 30-day C. difficile infection rate had 5% of patients acquiring C. difficile in the intermittent bolus arm and 2.5% in the continuous infusion arm. The intermittent bolus arm used 55% fewer pantoprazole vials than the continuous infusion arm. CONCLUSION: In hospitalized patients, the utilization of pantoprazole intermittent bolus is not only comparably efficacious but potentially represents a safer and economically advantageous alternative compared to the current guideline recommendation of a 72-hour pantoprazole continuous infusion. Further studies could provide more robust data to support our findings and challenge the current recommendation for patients who meet the indication criteria. CI - Copyright (c) 2023, Hernandez et al. FAU - Hernandez, Ivan A AU - Hernandez IA AD - Pharmacy, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA. FAU - Morell, Jason AU - Morell J AD - Pharmacy, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA. FAU - Mulcahy, Lauren AU - Mulcahy L AD - Pharmacy, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, USA. FAU - Luzardo, Daniela AU - Luzardo D AD - Pharmacy, University of Florida, Miami, USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20231031 PL - United States TA - Cureus JT - Cureus JID - 101596737 PMC - PMC10688605 OTO - NOTNLM OT - acute gastrointestinal bleed OT - clinical pharmacist OT - gastroenterology and endoscopy OT - proton pump inhibitor OT - s: acute variceal upper gastrointestinal bleed COIS- The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. EDAT- 2023/12/04 06:42 MHDA- 2023/12/04 06:43 PMCR- 2023/10/31 CRDT- 2023/12/04 05:00 PHST- 2023/10/31 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/12/04 06:43 [medline] PHST- 2023/12/04 06:42 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/12/04 05:00 [entrez] PHST- 2023/10/31 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.7759/cureus.48056 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Cureus. 2023 Oct 31;15(10):e48056. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48056. eCollection 2023 Oct.