PMID- 38073901 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE LR - 20231211 IS - 2220-3206 (Print) IS - 2220-3206 (Electronic) IS - 2220-3206 (Linking) VI - 13 IP - 11 DP - 2023 Nov 19 TI - Effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on anxiety, labor analgesia and motor blocks in women during natural delivery. PG - 838-847 LID - 10.5498/wjp.v13.i11.838 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND: The background of this study was analgesia in natural delivery. The combined spinal-epidural anesthesia has obvious analgesic effect on the parturients in natural labor, and combined spinal-epidural anesthesia has been widely used in anesthesia for various diseases. AIM: To study the effects of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on anxiety, labor analgesia, and motor blocks in parturients during natural delivery. METHODS: A total of 120 women who gave birth at Changning District Maternal and Child Health Hospital between December 2021 to December 2022 were included; a random number table approach was employed to divide the women into a control group and a joint group, with each group consisting of 60 women. The control group was given epidural anesthesia, while the joint group was given combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the degree of maternal pain. Comparisons were made between the two groups' conditions of childbirth and the duration of labor. Apgar scores were used to evaluate the status of the newborns at birth; Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES) scores, umbilical artery blood gas analysis indices and stress indices were compared between the two groups; and the frequencies of motor block and postpartum complications were analyzed. RESULTS: In comparison to the control group, in the joint group, the VAS scores for the first, second, and third stages of labor were lower (P < 0.05). The rates of conversion to cesarean section and postpartum blood loss in the joint group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the Apgar score, the duration of the first stage of labor, or the total duration of labor between the two groups (P > 0.05). The second and third stages of labor in the joint group were shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05). When compared to the control group, the postpartum SAS score of the joint group was lower, while the GSES score was greater (P < 0.05). Between the control group and the joint group, the differences observed in pH, arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure, arterial oxygen partial pressure, or arterial hydrogen ion concentration were not significant (P > 0.05). Nitric oxide, cortisol, and adrenaline levels were lower in the joint group than in the control group (P < 0.05). There were no substantial differences in Bromage grade or rate of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: For parturients during natural delivery, combined spinal-epidural anesthesia can reduce anxiety, provide labor analgesia, shorten labor time, and reduce postoperative stress levels but did not result in a motor block. CI - (c)The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Cai, Ling AU - Cai L AD - Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Changning Maternity & Infant Health Hospital, Shanghai 200050, China. FAU - Jiang, Jiao-Jiao AU - Jiang JJ AD - Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Changning Maternity & Infant Health Hospital, Shanghai 200050, China. FAU - Wang, Ting-Ting AU - Wang TT AD - Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Changning Maternity & Infant Health Hospital, Shanghai 200050, China. FAU - Cao, Shuang AU - Cao S AD - Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Changning Maternity & Infant Health Hospital, Shanghai 200050, China. 13817340402@163.com. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20231119 PL - United States TA - World J Psychiatry JT - World journal of psychiatry JID - 101610480 PMC - PMC10701213 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Anxiety level OT - Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia OT - Labor analgesia OT - Motor block OT - Natural delivery COIS- Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article. EDAT- 2023/12/11 06:45 MHDA- 2023/12/11 06:46 PMCR- 2023/11/19 CRDT- 2023/12/11 05:37 PHST- 2023/07/18 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/08/28 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2023/09/22 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/12/11 06:46 [medline] PHST- 2023/12/11 06:45 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/12/11 05:37 [entrez] PHST- 2023/11/19 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.5498/wjp.v13.i11.838 [doi] PST - epublish SO - World J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 19;13(11):838-847. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i11.838. eCollection 2023 Nov 19.