PMID- 38141686 OWN - NLM STAT- Publisher LR - 20240422 IS - 1097-6779 (Electronic) IS - 0016-5107 (Linking) DP - 2023 Dec 21 TI - Comparing a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle with a 22-gauge fine-needle biopsy needle for EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: a prospective randomized study. LID - S0016-5107(23)03166-8 [pii] LID - 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.022 [doi] AB - BACKGROUND AND AIMS: EUS-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) sampling is being increasingly used. We performed a prospective randomized trial to compare specimen adequacy of a 19-gauge fine-needle biopsy (FNB) needle with a 22-gauge FNB Franseen tip needle for EUS-LB sampling. METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients referred for EUS-LB sampling were prospectively randomized to a 19-gauge or 22-gauge FNB needle. When the specimen with the 22-gauge needle was macroscopically inadequate, an additional pass with the 19-gauge needle was done. Bilobar EUS-LB sampling was performed with heparinized wet suction using 1 pass and 3 actuations per lobe. Descriptive statistics were computed for all variables. RESULTS: Biopsy sampling was performed for abnormal liver enzymes in 95.5% of patients (57% women; average age, 51 years). Five patients undergoing sampling with the 22-gauge FNB needle had macroscopically inadequate specimens and required additional biopsy sampling with the 19-gauge FNB needle. Mean preprocessing length of the longest tissue core was 21.5 +/- 6.3 mm with a 19-gauge FNB needle compared with 9.4 +/- 5.5 mm with the 22-gauge FNB needle (P < .001). Postprocessing specimens were significantly longer with 19-gauge than with 22-gauge FNB needles (17.4 mm vs 6.8, P < .001). There were no adverse events, and postprocedure pain and discomfort was similar in both groups (14% for 19-gauge vs 10% for 22-gauge, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Liver core biopsy sampling using the 19-gauge FNB needle is superior to the 22-gauge FNB needle in terms of length of longest core and aggregate specimen length. Considerably more fragmentation of the 22-gauge cores occurs during tissue processing. No increased postprocedure pain or AEs were found with the 19-gauge needle. A 19-gauge FNB needle is preferred to the 22-gauge FNB needle for EUS-LB. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT04806607.). CI - Copyright (c) 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. FAU - Diehl, David L AU - Diehl DL AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. FAU - Sangwan, Vikas AU - Sangwan V AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. FAU - Johal, Amitpal S AU - Johal AS AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. FAU - Khara, Harshit S AU - Khara HS AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. FAU - Confer, Bradley AU - Confer B AD - Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. LA - eng SI - ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04806607 PT - Journal Article DEP - 20231221 PL - United States TA - Gastrointest Endosc JT - Gastrointestinal endoscopy JID - 0010505 SB - IM COIS- Disclosure The following authors disclosed financial relationships: D. L. Diehl: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Olympus, and Cook Medical. H. S. Khara: Consultant for Boston Scientific, Olympus, and Medtronic. B. Confer: Speaker for Boston Scientific; consultant for Exact Sciences. All other authors disclosed no financial relationships. EDAT- 2023/12/24 09:41 MHDA- 2023/12/24 09:41 CRDT- 2023/12/23 19:24 PHST- 2023/08/05 00:00 [received] PHST- 2023/10/27 00:00 [revised] PHST- 2023/12/17 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2023/12/24 09:41 [pubmed] PHST- 2023/12/24 09:41 [medline] PHST- 2023/12/23 19:24 [entrez] AID - S0016-5107(23)03166-8 [pii] AID - 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.022 [doi] PST - aheadofprint SO - Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Dec 21:S0016-5107(23)03166-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.022.