PMID- 38457134 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20240429 LR - 20240429 IS - 1938-1344 (Electronic) IS - 0190-6011 (Linking) VI - 54 IP - 5 DP - 2024 May TI - The Best Exercise Modality and Dose for Reducing Pain in Adults With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review With Model-Based Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. PG - 1-13 LID - 10.2519/jospt.2024.12153 [doi] AB - OBJECTIVE: To quantify the dose-response relationship between overall and specific exercise modalities and pain, in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain (LBP). DESIGN: Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis. LITERATURE SEARCH: We searched the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus databases from inception to June 2023. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials of exercise interventions in adults with nonspecific chronic LBP and at least 1 pain outcome reported at the main trial end point. DATA SYNTHESIS: A random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0, and used the GRADE approach to judge the certainty of evidence for each outcome. RESULTS: Eighty-two trials were included (n = 5033 participants). We found a nonlinear dose-response relationship between total exercise and pain in patients with nonspecific chronic LBP. The maximum significant response was observed at 920 MET minutes (standardized mean difference = -1.74; 95% credible intervals: -2.43, -1.04). The minimal clinically important difference for achieving meaningful pain improvement was 520 MET minutes per week. The dose to achieve minimal clinically important difference varied by type of exercise; Pilates was the most effective. The certainty of the evidence was very low to moderate for all outcomes. CONCLUSION: The dose-response relationship of different exercise modalities to improve pain in patients with nonspecific chronic LBP had a U-shaped trajectory and low- to moderate-certainty evidence. The clinical effect was most pronounced with Pilates exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(5):1-13. Epub 8 March 2024. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.12153. FAU - Liang, Zhide AU - Liang Z FAU - Tian, Shudong AU - Tian S FAU - Wang, Chuanzhi AU - Wang C FAU - Zhang, Meng AU - Zhang M FAU - Guo, Hengzhi AU - Guo H FAU - Yu, Yingdanni AU - Yu Y FAU - Wang, Xianliang AU - Wang X LA - eng PT - Journal Article PT - Meta-Analysis PT - Review PT - Systematic Review PL - United States TA - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther JT - The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy JID - 7908150 SB - IM MH - Humans MH - *Low Back Pain/therapy MH - *Exercise Therapy/methods MH - *Bayes Theorem MH - *Network Meta-Analysis MH - Chronic Pain/therapy MH - Adult MH - Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic MH - Minimal Clinically Important Difference OTO - NOTNLM OT - dose-response OT - exercise OT - model-based network meta-analysis OT - nonspecific chronic low back pain OT - pain EDAT- 2024/03/08 12:43 MHDA- 2024/04/30 04:21 CRDT- 2024/03/08 11:33 PHST- 2024/04/30 04:21 [medline] PHST- 2024/03/08 12:43 [pubmed] PHST- 2024/03/08 11:33 [entrez] AID - 10.2519/jospt.2024.12153 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2024 May;54(5):1-13. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2024.12153.