PMID- 38509540 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 20240322 LR - 20240323 IS - 1748-717X (Electronic) IS - 1748-717X (Linking) VI - 19 IP - 1 DP - 2024 Mar 20 TI - Automatic IMRT treatment planning through fluence prediction and plan fine-tuning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PG - 39 LID - 10.1186/s13014-024-02401-0 [doi] LID - 39 AB - BACKGROUND: At present, the implementation of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning for geometrically complex nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) through manual trial-and-error fashion presents challenges to the improvement of planning efficiency and the obtaining of high-consistency plan quality. This paper aims to propose an automatic IMRT plan generation method through fluence prediction and further plan fine-tuning for patients with NPC and evaluates the planning efficiency and plan quality. METHODS: A total of 38 patients with NPC treated with nine-beam IMRT were enrolled in this study and automatically re-planned with the proposed method. A trained deep learning model was employed to generate static field fluence maps for each patient with 3D computed tomography images and structure contours as input. Automatic IMRT treatment planning was achieved by using its generated dose with slight tightening for further plan fine-tuning. Lastly, the plan quality was compared between automatic plans and clinical plans. RESULTS: The average time for automatic plan generation was less than 4 min, including fluence maps prediction with a python script and automated plan tuning with a C# script. Compared with clinical plans, automatic plans showed better conformity and homogeneity for planning target volumes (PTVs) except for the conformity of PTV-1. Meanwhile, the dosimetric metrics for most organs at risk (OARs) were ameliorated in the automatic plan, especially D(max) of the brainstem and spinal cord, and D(mean) of the left and right parotid glands significantly decreased (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: We have successfully implemented an automatic IMRT plan generation method for patients with NPC. This method shows high planning efficiency and comparable or superior plan quality than clinical plans. The qualitative results before and after the plan fine-tuning indicates that further optimization using dose objectives generated by predicted fluence maps is crucial to obtain high-quality automatic plans. CI - (c) 2024. The Author(s). FAU - Cai, Wenwen AU - Cai W AD - School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. FAU - Ding, Shouliang AU - Ding S AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, China. FAU - Li, Huali AU - Li H AD - School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. FAU - Zhou, Xuanru AU - Zhou X AD - School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. FAU - Dou, Wen AU - Dou W AD - Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510282, China. FAU - Zhou, Linghong AU - Zhou L AD - School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. FAU - Song, Ting AU - Song T AD - School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China. tingsong2015@smu.edu.cn. FAU - Li, Yongbao AU - Li Y AD - Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, 510060, China. liyb1@sysucc.org.cn. LA - eng GR - 2021A1515012044/Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China/ GR - 2022A1515010639/Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation, China/ GR - SL2022A04J01215/Guangzhou Science and Technology Foundation, China/ PT - Journal Article DEP - 20240320 PL - England TA - Radiat Oncol JT - Radiation oncology (London, England) JID - 101265111 SB - IM MH - Humans MH - Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy MH - *Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods MH - Radiotherapy Dosage MH - Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods MH - Organs at Risk MH - *Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy PMC - PMC10956235 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Automatic planning OT - Fluence prediction OT - IMRT OT - Nasopharyngeal carcinoma OT - Plan fine-tuning COIS- The authors declare that they have no competing interests. EDAT- 2024/03/21 06:43 MHDA- 2024/03/22 06:44 PMCR- 2024/03/20 CRDT- 2024/03/21 00:48 PHST- 2023/08/14 00:00 [received] PHST- 2024/01/09 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2024/03/22 06:44 [medline] PHST- 2024/03/21 06:43 [pubmed] PHST- 2024/03/21 00:48 [entrez] PHST- 2024/03/20 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1186/s13014-024-02401-0 [pii] AID - 2401 [pii] AID - 10.1186/s13014-024-02401-0 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Radiat Oncol. 2024 Mar 20;19(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13014-024-02401-0.