PMID- 9291452 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 19971001 LR - 20190512 IS - 0002-9173 (Print) IS - 0002-9173 (Linking) VI - 108 IP - 3 DP - 1997 Sep TI - Optimal procedures for detecting analytic bias using patient samples. PG - 254-68 AB - We recently described the performance characteristics of the exponentially adjusted moving mean (EAMM), a patient-data, moving block mean procedure, which is a generalized algorithm that unifies Bull's algorithm and the classic average of normals (AON) procedure. Herein we describe the trend EAMM (TEAMM), a continuous signal analog of the EAMM procedure related to classic trend analysis. Using computer simulation, we have compared EAMM and TEAMM over a range of biases for various sample sizes (N or equivalent smoothing factor alpha) and exponential parameters (P) under conditions of equivalent false rejection (fixed on a per patient sample basis). We found optimal pairs of N and P for each level of bias by determination of minimum mean patient samples to rejection. Overall optimal algorithms were determined through calculation of undetected lost medical utility (ULMU), a novel function that quantifies the medical damage due to analytic bias. The ULMU function was calculated based on lost test specificity in a normal population. We found that optimized TEAMM was superior to optimized EAMM for all levels of analytic bias. If these observations hold true for non-Gaussian populations, TEAMM procedures are the method of choice for detecting bias using patient samples or as an event gauge to trigger use of known-value control materials. FAU - Smith, F A AU - Smith FA AD - Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA. FAU - Kroft, S H AU - Kroft SH LA - eng PT - Comparative Study PT - Journal Article PL - England TA - Am J Clin Pathol JT - American journal of clinical pathology JID - 0370470 SB - IM MH - *Algorithms MH - Clinical Laboratory Information Systems MH - *Computer Simulation MH - Humans MH - Laboratories, Hospital/organization & administration/*standards MH - *Models, Statistical MH - Pathology, Clinical/organization & administration/*standards MH - Quality Control MH - Reproducibility of Results MH - *Selection Bias EDAT- 1997/09/18 00:00 MHDA- 1997/09/18 00:01 CRDT- 1997/09/18 00:00 PHST- 1997/09/18 00:00 [pubmed] PHST- 1997/09/18 00:01 [medline] PHST- 1997/09/18 00:00 [entrez] AID - 10.1093/ajcp/108.3.254 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Am J Clin Pathol. 1997 Sep;108(3):254-68. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/108.3.254.