PMID- 9381546 OWN - NLM STAT- MEDLINE DCOM- 19971107 LR - 20231103 IS - 0041-1337 (Print) IS - 1534-6080 (Electronic) IS - 0041-1337 (Linking) VI - 64 IP - 7 DP - 1997 Oct 15 TI - HLA and cross-reactive antigen group matching for cadaver kidney allocation. PG - 983-91 AB - BACKGROUND: Allocation of cadaver kidneys by graded human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility scoring arguably has had little effect on overall survival while prejudicing the transplant candidacy of African-American and other hard to match populations. Consequently, matching has been proposed of deduced amino acid residues of the individual HLA molecules shared by cross-reactive antigen groups (CREGs). We have examined the circumstances under which compatibility with either method impacted graft survival. METHODS: Using Cox proportional hazards regression modeling, we studied the relationship between levels of conventional HLA mismatch and other donor and recipient factors on primary cadaver kidney survival between 1981 and 1995 at the University of Pittsburgh (n=1,780) and in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Scientific Registry during 1991-1995 (n=31,291). The results were compared with those obtained by the matching of amino acid residues that identified CREG-compatible cases with as many as four (but not five and six) HLA mismatches. RESULTS: With more than one HLA mismatch (> 85% of patients in both series), most of the survival advantage of a zero mismatch was lost. None of the HLA loci were "weak." In the UNOS (but not Pittsburgh) category of one-HLA mismatch (n=1334), a subgroup of CREG-matched recipients (35.3%) had better graft survival than the remaining 64.7%, who were CREG-mismatched. There was no advantage of a CREG match in the two- to four-HLA incompatibility tiers. Better graft survival with tacrolimus was observed in both the Pittsburgh and UNOS series. CONCLUSIONS: Obligatory national sharing of cadaver kidneys is justifiable only for zero-HLA-mismatched kidneys. The potential value of CREG matching observed in the one-HLA-mismatched recipients of the UNOS (but not the Pittsburgh) experience deserves further study. FAU - Starzl, T E AU - Starzl TE AD - The Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pennsylvania 15213, USA. FAU - Eliasziw, M AU - Eliasziw M FAU - Gjertson, D AU - Gjertson D FAU - Terasaki, P I AU - Terasaki PI FAU - Fung, J J AU - Fung JJ FAU - Trucco, M AU - Trucco M FAU - Martell, J AU - Martell J FAU - McMichael, J AU - McMichael J FAU - Scantlebury, V AU - Scantlebury V FAU - Shapiro, R AU - Shapiro R FAU - Donner, A AU - Donner A LA - eng GR - R01 DK029961-19/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States GR - DK 29961/DK/NIDDK NIH HHS/United States PT - Journal Article PT - Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. PL - United States TA - Transplantation JT - Transplantation JID - 0132144 RN - 0 (HLA-A Antigens) RN - 0 (HLA-B Antigens) RN - 0 (HLA-DR Antigens) SB - IM MH - Adolescent MH - Adult MH - Black People/genetics MH - Cadaver MH - Child MH - Child, Preschool MH - Cross Reactions MH - Female MH - Graft Survival/immunology/*physiology MH - HLA-A Antigens/immunology MH - HLA-B Antigens/immunology MH - HLA-DR Antigens/immunology MH - *Histocompatibility Testing MH - Humans MH - Infant MH - Male MH - Middle Aged MH - Pennsylvania MH - Proportional Hazards Models MH - Registries MH - Retrospective Studies MH - Time Factors MH - *Tissue Donors MH - Tissue and Organ Procurement/*methods/organization & administration MH - White People PMC - PMC2967288 MID - NIHMS241750 EDAT- 1997/11/05 00:00 MHDA- 1997/11/05 00:01 PMCR- 2010/11/01 CRDT- 1997/11/05 00:00 PHST- 1997/11/05 00:00 [pubmed] PHST- 1997/11/05 00:01 [medline] PHST- 1997/11/05 00:00 [entrez] PHST- 2010/11/01 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.1097/00007890-199710150-00009 [doi] PST - ppublish SO - Transplantation. 1997 Oct 15;64(7):983-91. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199710150-00009.