PMID- 25404928 OWN - NLM STAT- PubMed-not-MEDLINE DCOM- 20141118 LR - 20220408 IS - 1664-2295 (Print) IS - 1664-2295 (Electronic) IS - 1664-2295 (Linking) VI - 5 DP - 2014 TI - Leptomeningeal metastases in high-grade adult glioma: development, diagnosis, management, and outcomes in a series of 34 patients. PG - 220 LID - 10.3389/fneur.2014.00220 [doi] LID - 220 AB - METHODS: Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) in the setting of glioma have often been thought to carry a particularly poor prognosis. We sought to better characterize this phenomenon through a review of patients with glioma seen in our institution over the preceding 10 years. We focus here on 34 cases with LM due to grade III or IV glioma. Over the period in question, we estimate a prevalence of almost 4% in those affected by grade IV tumors. RESULTS: Leptomeningeal spread was present at the time of initial diagnosis in 4 patients. Among the others, LM occurred at the time of first progression of disease in 17. The median time to development of LM (excluding those where it was present at initial diagnosis) was 16.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.2-43.9]. The median time to further progression of disease following LM was 4.9 months (95% CI 3.1-6.9). Twenty-five patients were known to have died at the time of writing. Thus, median overall survival (OS) was 10.2 months (95% CI 8.8-14.7) following LM. At the time of diagnosis of LM, some form of treatment (chemotherapy and/or radiation vs. no treatment) increased OS (median 11.7 vs. 3.3 months, p < 0.001 by log-rank test). Use of radiation therapy (vs. no radiation) also increased OS, although the effect was more modest (7.8 vs. 16.8 months, p = 0.07). Higher Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) at the time of diagnosis of LM was associated with OS (p = 0.007, median OS for KPS >/=90 19 months vs. 7.8 for KPS <90). In a two-variable model incorporating the use any treatment (vs. none) and KPS, the latter tended to be a more significant predictor of survival (p = 0.22 vs. p = 0.06 by likelihood-ratio test). This was also true for radiation (vs. none) and KPS (p = 0.27 vs. p = 0.02). No significant benefit could be demonstrated for the use of chemotherapy considered alone, either systemic or intrathecal. It should be noted that 4 of 9 patients receiving intrathecal chemotherapy had a ventriculo-peritoneal shunt in place during these injections, which may have reduced its effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Overall, treatment appears to improve outcomes. We favor maximal treatment, as tolerated, particularly with a KPS of >/=70. Such treatment would typically include radiation to the maximum tolerated dose, concurrent, and adjuvant chemotherapy (preferably with an alkyating agent), in addition to intrathecal treatment. FAU - Dardis, Christopher AU - Dardis C AD - Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute , Phoenix, AZ , USA. FAU - Milton, Kelly AU - Milton K AD - Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute , Phoenix, AZ , USA. FAU - Ashby, Lynn AU - Ashby L AD - Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute , Phoenix, AZ , USA. FAU - Shapiro, William AU - Shapiro W AD - Department of Neurology, Barrow Neurological Institute , Phoenix, AZ , USA. LA - eng PT - Journal Article DEP - 20141103 PL - Switzerland TA - Front Neurol JT - Frontiers in neurology JID - 101546899 PMC - PMC4217477 OTO - NOTNLM OT - Ommaya OT - glioblastoma multiforme OT - glioma OT - intrathecal OT - leptomeningeal OT - metastases EDAT- 2014/11/19 06:00 MHDA- 2014/11/19 06:01 PMCR- 2014/11/03 CRDT- 2014/11/19 06:00 PHST- 2014/04/22 00:00 [received] PHST- 2014/10/09 00:00 [accepted] PHST- 2014/11/19 06:00 [entrez] PHST- 2014/11/19 06:00 [pubmed] PHST- 2014/11/19 06:01 [medline] PHST- 2014/11/03 00:00 [pmc-release] AID - 10.3389/fneur.2014.00220 [doi] PST - epublish SO - Front Neurol. 2014 Nov 3;5:220. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2014.00220. eCollection 2014.